雅思閱讀判斷題正誤解析（8月1日雅思閱讀考試真題答案）

最近經(jīng)常有小伙伴私信詢問雅思閱讀判斷題正誤解析（8月1日雅思閱讀考試真題答案）相關的問題，今天，大學路小編整理了以下內(nèi)容，希望可以對大家有所幫助。

本文目錄一覽：

• 1、雅思閱讀判斷題正誤解析
• 2、2020年8月1日雅思閱讀考試真題答案
• 3、劍橋雅思難度排行4-17

雅思閱讀判斷題正誤解析

雅思閱讀中的判斷題，看似簡單的對錯，其實也難分辨，所以，雅思頻道我為你整理了《 雅思閱讀判斷題正誤解析 》，希望對考生有所幫助。

以C7T4P1為例:

“Clemmons found a strange hieroglyph on the wall of an Egyptian monument.”【題目】

分析:“Clemmons”在埃及紀念碑的墻上發(fā)現(xiàn)了一個奇怪的象形文字。

解題思路:通過顯性詞人名和特殊名詞定位,即“Clemmons和hieroglyph, wall, monument.”

“Now a Californian software consultant called Maureen Clemmons has suggested that kites

might have been involved. While perusing a book on the monuments of Egypt, she noticed a

hieroglyph that showed a row of men standing in odd postures.” 【原文】

答案分析:文意理解:“Clemmons在瀏覽關于埃及紀念碑的書籍的時候發(fā)現(xiàn)了象形文字”。題目是在墻上發(fā)現(xiàn)的象形文字,和原文正好矛盾。

以C7T2P3為例:

“Phase I of MIRTP consisted of a survey of household expenditure on transport.”【題目】

分析:MIRTP項目的第一階段主要包括對家庭出行開支的調查。

解題思路:“Phase I, MIRTP”的定位以及考點詞“household expenditure”的定位。

“Little was known about the transport demands of the rural households, so Phase I, between

December 1985 and December 1987, focused on research. The socio-economic survey of more

than 400 households in the district indicated that a household in Makete spent, on average, seven hours a day on transporting themselves and their goods.”【原文】

答案分析:文意理解:“Phase I 的調查主要關于當?shù)?00多戶家庭平均每天花費7小時用于出行和貨物運輸。題目內(nèi)容則強化交通費用而非交通時間,所以與原文矛盾?！?

以C7T3P1為例:

“Ants use the same channels of communication as humans do.”【題目】

分析:螞蟻與人的交流方式相同。

解題思路:“channels of communication ”為定位詞;“same”為考點詞。

“Ants store food, repel attackers and use chemical signals to contact one another in case of

attack. Such chemical communication can be compared to the human use of visual and auditory

channels.”【原文】

答案分析:文意理解:“螞蟻使用 “chemical signals”而人類使用 “visual and auditory channels”進 行contact one another. 所以螞蟻和人類的交流方式并非相同。

上述就是雅思頻道為你帶來的雅思閱讀判斷題的NO/FLASE淺談,我們可以初步知曉判斷題基本都存在考點詞。我們考生唯一要做的是找到考點詞或其替換詞,結合原文得出一致或矛盾或無提及的結論。

2020年8月1日雅思閱讀考試真題答案

8月1號進行了八月初的第一場雅思的考試，相信大家對真題以及答案會非常的感興趣、今天就由的我為大家介紹2020年8月1日雅思閱讀考試真題答案。

一、考題解析

P1 土地沙漠化

P2 澳大利亞的鸚鵡

P3 多重任務

二、名師點評

1.8月份首場考試的難度總體中等，有出現(xiàn)比較多的配對題，沒有出現(xiàn)Heading題，其余主要以常規(guī)的填空，判斷和選擇題為主。文章的話題和題型搭配也是在劍橋真題中都有跡可循，所以備考重心依然還是劍橋官方真題。

2. 整體分析：涉及環(huán)境類（P1）、動物類（P2）、社科類（P3）。

本次考試的P2和P3均為舊題。P2是動物類的話題，題型組合為：段落細節(jié)配對+單選+summary填空，難度中等。題型上也延續(xù)19年的出題特點，出現(xiàn)配對題，考察定位速度和準確度。P3也出現(xiàn)了段落細節(jié)配對，主要是段落細節(jié)配對+單選+判斷。三種題型難度中等，但是文章理解起來略有難度。

3. 部分答案及參考文章：

Passage 1：土地沙漠化

題型及答案待確認

Passage 2：澳大利亞的鸚鵡

題型：段落細節(jié)配對+單選+Summary填空

技巧分析：由于段落細節(jié)配對是完全亂序出題，在定位時需要先做后面的單選題及填空題，最大化利用已讀信息來確定答案，盡量避免重復閱讀，以保證充分的做題時間。

文章內(nèi)容及題目參考：

A 概況，關于一個大的生物種類

B 一些物種消失的原因，題干關鍵詞：an example of one bird species extinct

C 一種鸚鵡不能自己存活，以捕食另一種鳥為生，吃該鳥類的蛋。題干關鍵詞：two species competed at the expense of oneanother

D 吸引鸚鵡的原因以及鸚鵡嘴的特點。題干關鍵詞：*ysis of reasons as Australian landscapeattract parrots

E 植物是如何適應鸚鵡。題干關鍵詞：plants attract birds which make the animal adaptto the environment

F 南半球對英語的影響

G 兩種鸚鵡從環(huán)境改變中獲益并存活下來。題干關鍵詞：two species of parrots benefit fromm theenvironment change

H 外來物種及本地鸚鵡

I 鳥類棲息地被破壞以及人類采取的措施

J 作者對于鸚鵡問題的態(tài)度

單選題：

why parrots in the whole world are lineal descendants of

選項關鍵詞：continent split from Africa

the writer thinks parrots species beak is for

選項關鍵詞：adjust to their suitable diet

which one is not mentioned

選項關鍵詞：should be frequently maintained

填空題：分布在文章的前兩段

one-sixth

16th century

mapmaker

John Gould

Passage 3：多重任務

題型：段落細節(jié)配對+單選+判斷

參考答案及文章

28 F

29I

30C

31B

32G

33C

34B

35A

36YES

37YES

38NO

39NOT GIVEN

40NO

Passage3： multitasking

Multitasking Debate—Can you do them at the same time？

Talking on the phone while driving isn＇t the only situationwhere we＇re worse at multitasking than we might like to think we are. Newstudies have identified a bottleneck in our brains that some say means we arefundamentally incapable of true multitasking. If experimental findings reflectreal-world performance， people who think they are multitasking are probablyjust underperforming in all-or at best， all but one -of their parallelpursuits. Practice might improve your performance， but you will never be asgood as when focusing on one task at a time.

The problem， according to René Marois， a psychologist atVanderbilt University in Nashville， Tennessee， is that there＇s a sticking pointin the brain. To demonstrate this， Marois devised an experiment to locate nteers watch a screen and when a particular image appears， a red circle，say， they have to press a key with their index finger. Different colouredcircles require presses from different fingers. Typical response time is about half a second， and thevolunteers quickly reach their peak performance. Then they learn to listen todifferent recordings and respond by making a specific sound. For instance， whenthey hear a bird chirp， they have to say ＂ba＂； an electronic soundshould elicit a ＂ko＂， and so on. Again， no problem. A normal personcan do that in about half a second， with almost no effort. The trouble comeswhen Marois shows the volunteers an image， then almost immediately plays them asound. Now they＇re flummoxed. ＂If you show an image and play a sound atthe same time， one task is postponed，＂ he says. In fact，if the second taskis introduced within the half-second or so it takes to process and react to thefirst， it will simply be delayed until the first one is done. The largestdual-task delays occur when the two tasks are presented simultaneously； delaysprogressively shorten as the interval between presenting the tasks lengthens（See Diagram）.

There are at least three points where we seem to getstuck， says Marois. The first is in simply identifying what we＇re looking ?can take a few tenths of a second， during which time we are not able tosee and recognise a second item. This limitation is known as the＂attentional blink＂： experiments have shown that if you＇re watchingout for a particular event and a second one shows up unexpectedly any timewithin this crucial window of concentration， it may register in your visualcortex but you will be unable to act upon it. Interestingly， if you don＇texpect the first event， you have no trouble responding to the second. Whatexactly causes the attentional blink is still a matter for debate.

A second limitation is in our short-term visual ＇s estimated that we can keep track of about four items at a time， fewer ifthey are complex. This capacity shortage is thought to explain， in part， our astonishinginability to detect even huge changes in scenes that are otherwise identical，so-called ＂change blindness＂. Show people pairs of near-identicalphotos -say， aircraft engines in one picture have disappeared in the other -andthey will fail to spot the differences （if you don＇t believe it， check out theclips at /~rensink/flicker/download）. Here again， though， thereis disagreement about what the essential limiting factor really is. Does itcome down to a dearth of storage capacity， or is it about how much attention aviewer is paying？

A third limitation is that choosing a response to astimulus -braking when you see a child in the road， for instance，or replyingwhen your mother tells you over the phone that she＇s thinking of leaving yourdad -also takes brainpower. Selecting a response to one of these things willdelay by some tenths of a second your ability to respond to the other. This iscalled the ＂response selection bottleneck＂ theory， first proposed in1952.

Last December， Marois and his colleagues published apaper arguing that this bottleneck is in fact created in two different areas ofthe brain： one in the posterior lateral prefrontal cortex and another in thesuperior medial frontal cortex （Neuron， vol 52， p 1109）. They found this byscanning people＇s brains with functional MRI while the subjects struggled tochoose among eight possible responses to each of two closely timed tasks. Theydiscovered that these brain areas are not tied to any particular sense but aregenerally involved in selecting responses， and they seemed to queue theseresponses when presented with multiple tasks concurrently.

Bottleneck？ What bottleneck？

But David Meyer， a psychologist at the University ofMichigan， Ann Arbor， doesn＇t buy the bottleneck idea. He thinks dual-taskinterference is just evidence of a strategy used by the brain to prioritisemultiple activities. Meyer is known as something of an optimist by his ?has written papers with titles like ＂Virtually perfect time-sharing indual-task performance： Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck＂（Psychological Science， vol 12， p101）. His experiments have shown that withenough practice -at least 2000 tries -some people can execute two taskssimultaneously as competently as if they were doing them one after the ?suggests that there is a central cognitive processor that coordinates allthis and， what＇s more， he thinks it uses discretion： sometimes it chooses todelay one task while completing another.

Even with practice， not all people manage to achieve thisharmonious time-share， however. Meyer argues that individual differences comedown to variations in the character of the processor -some brains are just more＂cautious＂， some more ＂daring＂. And despite urban legend，there are no noticeable

differences between men and women. So， according to him，it＇s not a central bottleneck that causes dual-task interference， but rather＂adaptive executive control＂， which ＂schedules task processesappropriately to obey instructions about their relative priorities and serialorder＂.

Marois agrees that practice can sometimes eraseinterference effects. He has found that with just 1 hour of practice each dayfor two weeks， volunteers show a huge improvement at managing both his tasks atonce. Where he disagrees with Meyer is in what the brain is doing to achievethis. Marois speculates that practice might give us the chance to find lesscongested circuits to execute a task -rather like finding trusty back streetsto avoid heavy traffic on main roads -effectively making our response to thetask subconscious. After all， there are plenty of examples of subconsciou*ultitasking that most of us routinely manage： walking and talking， eating andreading， watching TV and folding the laundry.

But while some dual tasks benefit from practice， otherssimply do not. ＂Certain kinds of tasks are really hard to do two atonce，＂ says Pierre Jolicoeur at the University of Montreal， Canada， whoalso studies multitasking. Dual tasks involving a visual stimulus andskeletal-motor response （which he dubs ＂in the eye and out the hand＂）and an auditory stimulus with a verbal response （＂in the ear and out themouth＂） do seem to be amenable to practice， he says. Jolicoeur has foundthat with enough training such tasks can be performed as well together asapart. He speculates that the brain connections that they use may be somehowspecial， because we learn to speak by hearing and learn to move by looking. Butpair visual input with a verbal response， or sound to motor， and there＇s nodramatic improvement. ＂It looks like no amount of practice will allow youto combine these，＂ he says.

For research purposes， these experiments have to be keptsimple. Real-world multitasking poses much greater challenges. Even the upbeatMeyer is sceptical about how a lot of us live our lives. Instant-messaging andtrying to do your homework？ ＂It can＇t be done，＂ he says. Conducting ajob interview while answering emails？ ＂There＇s no way you wind up being asgood.＂ Needless to say， there appear to be no researchers in the area ofmultitasking who believe that you can safely drive a car and carry on a phoneconversation. In fact， last year David Strayer at the University of Utah inSalt Lake City reported that people using cellphones drive no better thandrunks （Human Factors， vol 48， p 381）. In another study， Strayer found thatusing a hands-free kit did not improve a driver＇s response time. He concludedthat what distracts a driver so badly is the very act of talking to someone whoisn＇t present in the car and therefore is unaware of the hazards facing thedriver.

“No researchers believe it＇s safe to drive a car andcarry on a phone conversation”

It probably comes as no surprise that， generallyspeaking， we get worse at multitasking as we age. According to Art Kramer atthe University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign， who studies how ageing affectsour cognitive abilities， we peak in our 20s. Though the decline is slow throughour 30s and on into our 50s， it is there； and after 55， it becomes moreprecipitous. In one study， he and his colleagues had both young and oldparticipants do a simulated driving task while carrying on a conversation. Hefound that while young drivers tended to miss background changes， older driversfailed to notice things that were highly relevant. Likewise， older subjects hadmore trouble paying attention to the more important parts of a scene than youngdrivers.

It＇s not all bad news for over-55s， though. Kramer alsofound that older people can benefit from practice. Not only did they learn toperform better， brain scans showed that underlying that improvement was achange in the way their brains become active.

Whileit＇s clear that practice can often make a difference， especially as we age， thebasic facts remain sobering. ＂We have this impression of an almightycomplex brain，＂ says Marois， ＂and yet we have very humbling andcrippling limits.＂ For most of our history， we probably never needed to domore than one thing at a time， he says， and so we haven＇t evolved to be ableto. Perhaps we will in future， though. We might yet look back one day on peoplelike Debbie and Alun as ancestors of a new breed of true multitaskers.

劍橋雅思難度排行4-17

劍橋雅思難度排行4-17如下：

劍橋雅思4、劍雅5、劍雅7、劍雅9、劍雅10、劍雅14、劍雅15、劍雅16、劍雅6、劍雅8、劍雅12、劍雅13、劍雅17。

一、劍橋雅思考試

劍橋雅思是劍橋大學考試委員會（UCLES）主辦的一項考試，主要用于評估非英語為母語的英語使用者的英語能力。這項考試被廣泛用于申請英國、澳大利亞、加拿大等英語國家的大學、研究生院、工作單位等需要英語能力的場所。

其中，聽力部分要求考生根據(jù)所聽到的內(nèi)容完成填空、選擇等題型；閱讀部分要求考生在規(guī)定時間內(nèi)閱讀一篇長文，并根據(jù)文章內(nèi)容完成選擇、判斷等題型；寫作部分要求考生在規(guī)定時間內(nèi)完成一篇議論文和一篇說明文；口語部分要求考生與考官進行*的對話，包括對所提供的話題進行討論、描述等。

二、考試難度和特點

劍橋雅思考試的難度相對來說較高，考試的題目設計也比較靈活和多樣化。在聽力部分，考生需要聽懂英語口音和語速，同時需要快速反應和記錄關鍵信息；在閱讀部分，文章長度比較長，需要考生具備較高的閱讀速度和理解能力。

在寫作部分，要求考生具備良好的語言表達和邏輯思維能力；在口語部分，考官會根據(jù)考生的表現(xiàn)進行評分，因此需要考生具備流利的口語表達和語言組織能力。

三、考試用途和適用人群

劍橋雅思考試主要用于申請英國、澳大利亞、加拿大等英語國家的大學、研究生院等教育機構，同時也是一些企業(yè)招聘時所要求的英語能力測試之一。適用人群包括需要申請留學或工作的英語學習者、需要證明自己英語能力的工作人士等。

總之，劍橋雅思是一項具有較高難度和靈活性的英語能力測試，能夠全面評估考生的聽、說、讀、寫四個方面的能力。對于需要申請留學或工作的英語學習者來說，掌握好英語語言技能并取得好的成績將對未來的發(fā)展有很大的幫助。

以上就是大學路小編整理的內(nèi)容，想要了解更多相關資訊內(nèi)容敬請關注大學路。